The Pity and the Pattern: A Deep Dive into War Poetry and Digital Imitation
I am writing this blog as a task assigned by Prakruti Ma’am. The purpose of this task is to understand War Poetry as a literary genre and to explore how poets present the realities and impact of war. Through this blog, I aim to improve my literary understanding and critical thinking skills.
Introduction: The Paradox of Beautiful Horror
Poetry and war are, at first glance, ancient enemies. Poetry is the art of creation, structure, and elevated human spirit. War is the act of destruction, chaos, and the debasement of the body. Yet, throughout history, they have been inextricably linked. From the epic verses of Homer to the patriotic ballads of the Victorian era, poetry was the vessel used to carry the "glory" of conflict home.
However, as we explored in our recent classroom unit, the industrialization of slaughter in the 20th century shattered this vessel. The "War Poetry" we now recognize as canonical specifically from the First World War is not about glory; it is about the "pity of War," as Wilfred Owen famously declared.
This post serves as a reflection on our unit. We will dissect the definition of war poetry, analyze the excruciating tension between message and form in Wilfred Owen’s Dulce et Decorum est, and finally, test the limits of human expression by asking an Artificial Intelligence to replicate this trauma in the context of the Indo-Pak War of 1971.
Part 1: What is War Poetry? The Classroom Consensus
In our discussions, we moved beyond the simplistic definition of war poetry as "verse written about soldiers." Instead, we identified it as a specific mode of witness literature.
The Shift from Myth to Mud
Traditionally, war poetry was written by non-combatants or from a distance, focusing on abstract nouns: Honor, Glory, Valour, Sacrifice. This was the poetry of the "high diction."
However, the trench poets (Owen, Sassoon, Rosenberg) introduced a new requirement: sensory truth.
- Content: It shifted from the abstract to the concrete. Instead of "valour," we get "mud." Instead of "sacrifice," we get "blood-shod."
- Purpose: The purpose shifted from recruitment and memorialization to protest and warning.
The Significance of Form and Content
The most significant takeaway from our class was the realization that war poetry is defined by a battle within the poem itself. The poets were often educated in the Romantic tradition (Keats, Shelley). They had the tools of beauty (sonnets, iambic pentameter) but were forced to apply them to the ugliest realities imaginable.
This creates a cognitive dissonance for the reader. We hear the music of poetry, but the lyrics describe a massacre. This friction is what makes the genre so enduringly powerful; it is the sound of civilization trying to process its own collapse.
Part 2: The Tension of Witness in "Dulce et Decorum est"
Wilfred Owen’s Dulce et Decorum est is perhaps the supreme example of the tension between Message (the reality of war) and Form (the structure of the poem).
The Message: Dismantling the "Old Lie"
The message is unambiguous. Owen seeks to refute the Latin adage Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori ("It is sweet and fitting to die for one's country"). He argues that if the people at home could see the reality of a gas attack the physical gargling of blood, the white eyes writhing they would never repeat that slogan to children "ardent for some desperate glory."
The Form: A Cage for Chaos
The tension arises because Owen does not abandon form; he uses it as a straitjacket.
1. The Exhausted Rhythm
The poem begins in iambic pentameter, the standard meter of English poetry. But Owen corrupts it.
"Bent double, like old beggars under sacks..."
The rhythm is heavy, clogged with hard consonants. It mimics the physical trudge of the soldiers. They are marching asleep, and the meter drags its feet along with them. The form here is functioning, but it is tired.
2. The Rupture
The tension snaps in the second stanza.
"Gas! GAS! Quick, boys!"
Here, the iambic heartbeat fails. The spondees (stress-stress) and the capitalization disrupt the flow. This is the moment the "poetry" breaks down because the reality (chemical warfare) is too urgent for regular meter.
3. The Grotesque Rhyme
Owen uses an alternate rhyme scheme (ABAB), which usually creates a lyrical, song-like quality. In Dulce, this creates a horrific irony. He rhymes "glory" with "mori" (death), and "breath" with "death."
The most disturbing tension occurs in the description of the dying man:
"...the white eyes writhing in his face,
His hanging face, like a devil's sick of sin..."
He uses a simile (a poetic device) to describe a face melting from gas. By using high literary techniques to describe biological destruction, Owen creates a sense of violation. The form promises beauty; the content delivers nightmares. This tension forces the reader to look, denying us the ability to look away.
Part 3: The AI Experiment
In the spirit of our unit on "The Pity of War," I wanted to test if this specific voice the voice of the witness could be synthesized. Can an algorithm, which has never feared death, capture the tension we analyzed in Owen?
I tasked a poetry generator with applying Owen's specific style (sensory focus, anti-glory, strained meter) to a different conflict: The Indo-Pak War of 1971, specifically the Eastern Front (Bangladesh liberation), known for its riverine terrain and brutal guerilla warfare.
The Prompt
Instruction: Write a war poem on the Indo-Pak War of 1971 in the style and tone of Wilfred Owen.
Constraints: Focus on the muddy river deltas of East Pakistan, the plight of refugees, and the 'pity of war.' Use traditional meter that feels strained by the horror. End with a rejection of glory.
The Generated Result
The Delta’s Toll (1971)
The monsoon rains have turned the road to glue,
Where paddy-fields are rotting in the heat.
We march through silt, a grey and ghost-like crew,
With blisters bursting on our calloused feet.
No lark sings here above the Padma’s tide,
Only the mortar’s cough, the sudden flash,
Where village boys, who yesterday had died,
Are drifting logs amid the river trash.
Mukti they cry, in whispers through the reeds,
But we are deafened by the cannon’s roar.
What honour grows amid these tangle-weeds?
What valour washes on this muddy shore?
I saw a child, face down in jute and slime,
A broken doll that no one stopped to save.
You speak of victory and noble time,
But here, the delta digs a fluid grave.
So do not print the headlines bold and high,
Of strategies and generals in their pride.
You did not hear the refugee’s last cry,
Nor watch the blood infuse the rising tide.
The maps are drawn in ink of black and red,
But we have drawn them with the nameless dead.
Part 4: Reflection and Comparison
Comparing the AI-generated "The Delta’s Toll" with Owen’s Dulce et Decorum est reveals the fundamental gap between simulation and experience.
1. The Mimicry of Mechanics
The AI successfully mimicked the mechanics of the unit.
- Sensory Details: It used words like "glue," "rotting," "blisters," and "slime." It understood that war poetry requires ugliness.
- Structure: It adhered to a strict ABAB rhyme scheme and pentameter, mimicking the traditional forms Owen used.
- Thematic Pivot: It correctly ended with an address to the reader ("So do not print the headlines..."), mimicking Owen’s address to "My friend."
2. The Failure of Tension
However, the poem fails to capture the tension we discussed.
- Too Smooth: The meter in the AI poem is too perfect. It trots along comfortably. In Dulce, Owen intentionally stumbles; the rhythm breaks when the gas hits. The AI cannot replicate the psychological disruption of rhythm because it has no psychology to disrupt.
- Generic Imagery: While "broken doll" and "drifting logs" are competent metaphors, they are clichés. Owen’s imagery ("froth-corrupted lungs," "ecstasy of fumbling") was shocking because it was specific and weirdly original. The AI relies on the database of "sad war tropes" rather than a searing, singular memory.
3. The Missing "Pity"
The most significant difference is the lack of specific anger. Owen’s poem vibrates with rage against specific people (propaganists, the establishment). The AI poem feels like a sad song played in a minor key it performs sadness, but it doesn't feel it. It describes the 1971 context (Padma river, Mukti Bahini references), but it lacks the visceral connection to the land and the loss that a poet like Keith Douglas or Owen possessed.
Conclusion: The Human Element
This experiment reinforces the significance of war poetry in our classroom. We study these texts not just for their literary techniques, but for their humanity.
The tension in Dulce et Decorum est comes from a human soul being crushed by a mechanical reality. An AI, being a mechanical reality itself, cannot experience that crushing. It can write a poem about war, but it cannot write a War Poem. The "pity" that Owen wrote about requires a heart that can break, and that is the one thing the machine cannot generate.
0 Comments